Test-Retest Reliability, Effects of Age and Comparison of Horizontal 2 Semicircular Canals Gain Values between Head Impulse and Suppression Head Impulse Paradigms

4Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the test-retest reliability, aging effects, and differences in horizontal semicircular canals gain values between the head impulse paradigm and suppression head impulse paradigm. METHODS: Sixty healthy adult subjects aged 22-76-year-old (mean ± standard deviation = 47.27 ± 18.29) participated in the head impulse paradigm and suppression head impulse paradigm using the video head impulse test. The Head impulse paradigm was used to assess all 6 semicircular canals, while suppression head impulse paradigm measured only the horizontal canals. Twenty subjects aged 22-40-year-old (25.25 ± 4.9) underwent a second session for the test-retest reliability. RESULTS: There were good test-retest reliability for both measures (right horizontal head impulse paradigm, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.80; left horizontal head impulse paradigm, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.77; right anterior head impulse paradigm, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.86; left anterior head impulse paradigm, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.78; right posterior head impulse paradigm, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.78; left posterior head impulse paradigm, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.75; right horizontal suppression head impulse paradigm, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.76; left horizontal suppression head impulse paradigm, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.79). The test-retest reliability for suppression head impulse paradigmanti-compensatory saccade latency and amplitude were moderate (right latency, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.61; left latency, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.69; right amplitude, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.69; left amplitude, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.58). There were no significant effects of age on head impulse paradigm and suppression head impulse paradigm vestibulo-ocular reflex gain values and suppression head impulse paradigmsaccade latency. However, the saccade amplitude became smaller with increasing age, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sayed, S. Z., Wahat, N. H. A., Raymond, A. A., Hussein, N., & Omar, M. (2023). Test-Retest Reliability, Effects of Age and Comparison of Horizontal 2 Semicircular Canals Gain Values between Head Impulse and Suppression Head Impulse Paradigms. Journal of International Advanced Otology, 19(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2023.21387

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free