Association between Oregon's 12-Month Contraceptive Supply Policy and Quantity of Contraceptives Dispensed

8Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Importance: Eighteen states, including Oregon, have passed legislation requiring insurers to cover dispensation of a 12-month supply of short-acting, hormonal contraception. Objective: To determine whether Oregon's 2016 12-month supply law was associated with an increase in contraceptive supply received. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study of hormonal contraceptive users using Oregon's All Payer All Claims database examined the quantity of contraceptive supply dispensed 3 years before and 3 years after the 2016 policy change. We also assessed changes among patients attributed to Title X clinics. Exposures: Legislation requiring insurers in Oregon to cover a 12-month supply of contraception to continuing users. Main Outcomes and Measures: Receipt of a 12-month supply of hormonal contraception Results: This cohort study of insured users (mean [SD] age, 27.4 [2.1] years) of short-acting hormonal contraception included 639053 contraceptive prescriptions. Results indicated that more than 80% of prescriptions for contraceptives cover 3 months or fewer. Most women in the study population used the oral contraceptive pill, lived in a metropolitan area, and were privately insured. We did not observe a significant association between the passage of the 12-month supply policy and receipt of a 12-month supply (aOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.74-1.38). Receipt of a 12-month supply was more common for Medicaid recipients than the privately insured (aOR, 9.40; 95% CI, 6.62-13.34). We did find a shift from 1 month to 2 to 3 months supply being dispensed. The policy change was associated with a small, overall increase in quantity dispensed (0.27 months supply; 95% CI, 0.15 to -0.38). Title X clinics prescribed 3 months more of contraceptive supply than non-Title X clinics (3.03 months supply; 95% CI, 2.64-3.41). However, the policy change was not associated with increased contraceptive supply dispensed at Title X clinics. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of insured users of short-acting hormonal contraception, the passage of a 12-month contraceptive supply policy was not associated with an increase in contraceptive supply dispensed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodriguez, M. I., Lin, S. C., Steenland, M., & McConnell, K. J. (2022). Association between Oregon’s 12-Month Contraceptive Supply Policy and Quantity of Contraceptives Dispensed. JAMA Health Forum, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.5146

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free