Clinical and radiographic evaluation of peri-implant tissue changes associated with use of standard versus customized healing abutments

  • Almadani T
  • Amer A
  • abdallah H
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Risks of esthetic complications has been reported following dental implant insertion; hence it was hypothesis that a customized healing abutment could improve the peri-implant tissue healing. Aim: To evaluate healing around implants received a customized compared to a standard healing abutment. Patients & Methods: Twelve patients (eight females and four males aged 33-43) had two nearly comparable partial edentulous spaces on both sides of one jaw, split mouth technique were applied to divide theme into two groups: Group 1 sites received delayed implant with standard healing abutment; Group 2 sites received delayed implant with a customized healing abutment that fabricated in resin. Results: Twenty four implants were inserted successfully in the two groups. The Papilla Index was significantly higher in the customized than in the standard group at 2 and 3 months. The bone loss at mesial and distal sites was significantly higher in the customized than in the standard group at 6 and 9 months. Conclusion: Customized healing abutment group showed most favorable outcomes compared with that of standard healing abutment assessed with the criteria of PI and MBL.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Almadani, T., Amer, A.-F., abdallah, hisham, & El sayed, I. (2023). Clinical and radiographic evaluation of peri-implant tissue changes associated with use of standard versus customized healing abutments. Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science, 26(2), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2023.179122.1389

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free