Clinical and radiological outcome of stemmed hip replacement after revision from metal-on-metal resurfacing

25Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We report the outcome of total hip replacement in 29 failed metal-on-metal resurfacing hip replacements in which the primary surgery was performed between August 1995 and February 2005. The mean length of follow-up was five years (1.7 to 11.7). Of the 29 hip resurfacings, 19 acetabular components and all the femoral components were revised (28 uncemented stems and one cemented stem). There were no deaths and none of the patients was lost to follow-up. None of the hips underwent any further revision. The results of the revision resurfacing group were compared with those of a control group of age-matched patients. In the latter group there were 236 primary total hip replacements and 523 resurfacings performed during the same period by the same surgeons. The outcome of the revision resurfacing group was comparable with that of the stemmed primary hip replacement group but was less good than that of the primary hip resurfacing group. Long-term follow-up is advocated to monitor the outcome of these cases. ©2009 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eswaramoorthy, V. K., Biant, L. C., & Field, R. E. (2009). Clinical and radiological outcome of stemmed hip replacement after revision from metal-on-metal resurfacing. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B, 91(11), 1454–1458. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B11.22651

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free