Endoscopic Management of Bleeding in Altered Anatomy after Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Postoperative non variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage may occur early or late and affect a variable percentage of patients—up to about 2%. Most cases of intraluminal bleeding are an indication for urgent Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and require endoscopic haemostatic treatment. In addition to the approach usually adopted in non-variceal upper haemorrhages, these cases may be burdened with difficulties in terms of anastomotic tissue, angled positions, and the risk of further complications. There is also extreme variability related to the type of surgery performed, in the context of oncological disease or bariatric surgery. At the same time, the world of haemostatic devices available in digestive endoscopy is increasing, meeting high efficacy rates and attempting to treat even the most complex cases. Our narrative review summarises the current evidence in terms of different approaches to endoscopic haemostasis in upper bleeding in altered anatomy after surgery, proposing an up-to-date guidance for endoscopic clinicians and at the same time, highlighting areas of future scientific research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gibiino, G., Binda, C., Secco, M., Giuffrida, P., Coluccio, C., Perini, B., … Fabbri, C. (2023, November 1). Endoscopic Management of Bleeding in Altered Anatomy after Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery. Medicina (Lithuania). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59111941

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free