Role of IgM testing in the diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up of syphilis: A prospective cohort study

8Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives The diagnosis of repeat syphilis and its follow-up remains challenging. We aimed to investigate if IgM testing may assist in the diagnosis of syphilis reinfection/relapse and its treatment follow-up. Methods This substudy was conducted in the context of a syphilis biomarker discovery study (ClinicalTrials.gov Nr: NCT02059525). Sera were collected from 120 individuals with a new diagnosis of syphilis (72 with repeat infections) and 30 syphilis negative controls during a cohort study investigating syphilis biomarkers conducted at a sexually transmitted infection/HIV clinic in Antwerp, Belgium. Syphilis was diagnosed based on a simultaneous positive treponemal and non-treponemal assay result and/or positive serum PCR targeting polA. Specimens collected at visit of diagnosis, and 3 and 6 months post-treatment were tested by two enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), recomWell (Mikrogen; MI) and Euroimmun (EU), to detect anti-treponemal IgM. Baseline specimens were also tested for anti-treponemal IgM using a line immunoassay (LIA) recomLine (MI). Quantitative kinetic decay curves were constructed from the longitudinal quantitative EIA results. Results An overall sensitivity for the diagnosis of syphilis of 59.8% (95% CI: 50.3%-68.7%), 75.0% (95% CI: 66.1%-82.3%) and 63.3% (95% CI: 54.8%-72.6%) was obtained for the EU, MI EIAs and MI LIA, respectively. When only considering repeat syphilis, the diagnostic sensitivity decreased to 45.7% (95% CI: 33.9%-58.0%), 63.9% (95% CI: 51.7%-74.6%) and 47.2% (95% CI: 35.5%-59.3%), respectively. IgM seroreverted in most cases 6 months after treatment. Post-treatment IgM concentrations decreased almost 30% faster for initial syphilis compared with repeat infection. The IgM EIAs and IgM LIA agreed from fairly to moderately (Cohen's kappa (κ): 0.36 (EU EIA); κ: 0.53 (MI EIA); κ: 0.40 (MI LIA)) with the diagnosis of syphilis. Conclusions IgM detection was not a sensitive method to diagnose syphilis and was even poorer in the diagnosis of syphilis repeat infections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Osbak, K. K., Tsoumanis, A., De Baetselier, I., Van Esbroek, M., Smet, H., Kenyon, C. R., & Crucitti, T. (2020). Role of IgM testing in the diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up of syphilis: A prospective cohort study. BMJ Open, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035838

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free