Another Attempt to Move Beyond the Cross-Sectional U Shape of Happiness: A Reply

10Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this reply to Blanchflower and Graham (2021), we address key points in their response to our article, which challenged the robustness of the U shape in different contexts and aimed to move scholarship on life-course happiness beyond a focus on a single cross-sectional curve. We attend to apparent misconceptions in their portrayal of our arguments, identify points of agreement, and emphasize the value of exploring diversity rather than searching for homogeneity in patterns of change in well-being across life. Future longitudinal research to uncover the complex processes that characterize and underlie human happiness will lead to greater understanding that can benefit individuals and societies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Galambos, N. L., Krahn, H. J., Johnson, M. D., & Lachman, M. E. (2021). Another Attempt to Move Beyond the Cross-Sectional U Shape of Happiness: A Reply. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1447–1455. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211008823

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free