The effectiveness and safety of fluoroquinolone-containing regimen as a first-line treatment for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

15Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Fluoroquinolone is recommended as a pivotal antituberculous agent for treating multi-drugresistant pulmonary tuberculosis. However, its effectiveness as first-line treatment remains controversial. The present study was conducted to validate the fluoroquinolone-containing regimen for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until June 5, 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared antituberculous regimens containing fluoroquinolone with the standard regimen were included. Results: Eleven RCTs that included 6,334 patients were selected. Fluoroquinolone-containing regimens had a higher rate of sputum culture conversion at 2 months of treatment (M-H fixed odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-1.54). However, the outcomes were less favorable (M-H fixed OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.59-0.82) and the associated total adverse events were more frequent (M-H fixed OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.46-2.31) in the fluoroquinolone-containing regimen group, without a significant heterogeneity according to treatment duration. Treatment with the fluoroquinolone-containing regimen for 4 months showed a higher relapse rate. Conclusions: Despite a higher culture conversion rate at 2 months of treatment, the fluoroquinolone-containing regimen had limitations, including less favorable outcomes and more adverse events, as the first-line therapy for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, H. W., Lee, J. K., Kim, E., Yim, J. J., & Lee, C. H. (2016). The effectiveness and safety of fluoroquinolone-containing regimen as a first-line treatment for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159827

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free