Critical issues on the enforcement of the "true and fair view" accounting principle. Learning from Parmalat

1Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper analyses and discusses the "positive" issues of the overriding international financial reporting standards principle of "true and fair view" in connection with corporate governance mechanisms. The analysis is based on case study evidence. Empirical evidence from the Parmalat case with regards to the role of the information supply and demand side agents is analysed. This study provides evidence on how the relationship between corporate financial reporting and corporate governance mechanisms may influence the enforcement of the international financial reporting standards overriding principle of "true and fair view". Evidence is found that the enforcement of the "true and fair view" principle is intrinsically flawed when the accountability and the overall corporate governance systems do not work properly. Some evidence is also found for the argument that a lack in the quality of information supplied by the corporate financial system hurdles the role information demand side agents as effective monitors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Melis, A. (2005). Critical issues on the enforcement of the “true and fair view” accounting principle. Learning from Parmalat. Corporate Ownership and Control, 2(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv2i2p10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free