Custom v. standardized risk models

2Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We discuss when and why custom multi-factor risk models are warranted and give source code for computing some risk factors. Pension/mutual funds do not require customization but standardization. However, using standardized risk models in quant trading with much shorter holding horizons is suboptimal: (1) longer horizon risk factors (value, growth, etc.) increase noise trades and trading costs; (2) arbitrary risk factors can neutralize alpha; (3) “standardized” industries are artificial and insufficiently granular; (4) normalization of style risk factors is lost for the trading universe; (5) diversifying risk models lowers P&L correlations, reduces turnover and market impact, and increases capacity. We discuss various aspects of custom risk model building.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kakushadze, Z., & Liew, J. K. S. (2015). Custom v. standardized risk models. Risks, 3(2), 112–138. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks3020112

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free