The consequences of soft repression

22Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article examines the consequences of soft repression on social movement activists. By drawing on activists' perceptions, we develop a multilayered analytical framework that captures the experienced effects of soft repression at the individual, organizational, and movement levels. Our results show that soft repression-in particular, labeling, and stigmatization- primarily affect the individual level by triggering self-policing and self-control. By introducing a model that incorporates several radical social movement organizations, we also show how labeling and stigmatization affect different radical groups in different ways. These measures sometimes fail to demobilize the primary targets of the repressive actions, the most militant and clandestine groups. Instead, the demobilizing effects seem most evident in organizations that mobilize openly and inclusively. Our analysis is based on in-depth interviews with activists from the radical left-libertarian movement (RLLM) in Sweden, most of which have been active in organizations labeled as "violence-affirming extremists" by the Swedish government.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jämte, J., & Ellefsen, R. (2020). The consequences of soft repression. Mobilization, 25(3), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-25-3-383

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free