Abstract
Introduction: ‘Button’ gastrostomy insertion is traditionally a two-step procedure with an initial longer gastrostomy tube inserted followed by placement of the shorter ‘button’ gastrostomy in 6 weeks when the track is mature. The aim of this study is to assess whether the placement of a Button gastrostomy de novo is a safe and effective method of radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) insertion. Methods: Using our Picture Archive and Communication System (PACS) and electronic patient charts we identified all patients who underwent primary ‘button’ gastrostomy over an 8-year period with at least a 1-year follow-up period. We evaluated technical success rate, indications for insertion, major and minor complications, 30-day mortality and the number of exchanges performed. Results: Overall, 482 patients underwent a primary button RIG insertion during this period with an overall success rate of 97.1%. Indications for RIG insertion included neurological and neurosurgical disorders 236 (48.9%), head and neck malignancy 182 (37.8%), oesophageal malignancy 27 (5.6%) and other indications in 37 (7.7%). The mean age was 59.55 years (range 18–88 years) with 290 men (60.2%) and 192 women (39.8%). Major complications were recorded in 0.8% and minor complications in 1.7%. A 30-day mortality of 1% was identified (five patients), mortality was directly related to the RIG insertion in one patient (0.2%). A total of 65 exchanges/replacements took place over this period of time, with 33 (50.1%) due to ‘inadvertent removal’. Conclusion: Primary button RIG insertion is a procedure that has a high success rate and low morbidity and mortality. We believe it is a safe and effective alternative to deliver enteral nutrition.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Sheehan, M., O’Brien, C., Killick, D., Briody, H., Reid, C., Keeling, A., … Lee, M. J. (2023). An 8-year, single-centre experience of primary image-guided insertion of ‘button’ gastrostomy catheters: Technical and clinical results. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, 67(5), 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13501
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.