Comparison between cartilage and soft tissue ear piercing complications

79Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: Despite growing interest in cosmetic piercing, a detailed evaluation of associated medical complications is lacking. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire addressing ear, nose, and other body parts piercing was anonymously presented to 1,000 nurses at a major Midwestern teaching hospital, and responses were obtained from 552. Results: One hundred sixty (35%) of the 452 nurses who had an ear pierced reported a complication. Three hundred fifty-five (30%) of the 1,200 total pierced sites developed complications that included minor infection (77%), allergic reaction (43%), keloid (2.5%), and traumatic tear (2.5%). The complication rate from piercing through cartilage (32%) was not significantly different from that found when piercing through soft tissue (29%). The type of complications experienced differed in frequency between cartilage and soft tissue, with minor infection being more prevalent in cartilage piercing (30% v21%; P < .10) and allergic reaction found more frequently in soft tissue piercings (13% v4%; P < .025). Conclusion: This study identifies a low prevalence of major complications (<1%) and a relatively high prevalence of minor complications (30%) associated with ear piercing. The expected increase in complications and morbidity of piercing through cartilage was not found in this study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Simplot, T. C., & Hoffman, H. T. (1998). Comparison between cartilage and soft tissue ear piercing complications. American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery, 19(5), 305–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0709(98)90003-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free