Chemical analysis and biological properties of two different formulations of white portland cements

10Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

White Portland cement (WPC) has generated research interests in the field of endodontics. This study compared between the properties of two formulations of white Portland cement (WPC) of different origin (Malaysia [MA] and Egypt [EG]). WPCs with and without calcium chloride dihydrate were prepared. Scanning electron microscope (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray micro-analysis, and X-ray diffraction were used for surface morphology evaluation, elemental, and phase analysis, respectively. After the preparation of optimized serial dilutions, the cytotoxicity was evaluated on human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (HPLFs) and dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) using methyl-thiazol-diphenyltetrazolium assay after 24 and 72 h. Cell attachment properties were examined under SEM after 24 and 72 h. Results showed that the surface morphology and chemical composition of both formulations demonstrated detectable variations. The cytotoxicity evaluation showed different cellular responses of HPLFs compared to DSPCs. Both formulations favored the viability of HPLFs. However, the fast set formulations demonstrated severe cytotoxicity on DPSCs. Significant differences between EGWPC and MAWPC were identified (p < 0.05). The cell attachment properties were favorable; however, HPLFs attached and spread over the samples better than DPSCs. In conclusion, WPC of different origin may show differences in chemical and biological properties. The addition of CaCl2·2H2O to WPC can affect its properties. Human cell types may react differently towards different formulations of WPCs. SCANNING 38:303–316, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahmed, H. M. A., Luddin, N., Kannan, T. P., Mokhtar, K. I., & Ahmad, A. (2016). Chemical analysis and biological properties of two different formulations of white portland cements. Scanning, 38(4), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21270

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free