'Model-Platonism' in economics: On a classical epistemological critique

14Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Roughly 50 years ago, the eminent German philosopher and social scientist Hans Albert presented a critique of 'Model-Platonism' in economics to describe essential elements of the 'neoclassical style of economic reasoning'. Specifically, Albert advanced a series of epistemological arguments to illustrate conceptual shortcomings in neoclassical theory, which may be utilized to immunize the latter against conflicting empirical evidence. This article summarizes Albert's main arguments and illustrates his most important insights by using simple propositional logic. Based on these findings, a clarification and definition of 'Model-Platonism' is offered and the applicability of the Model-Platonism-critique to current developments in mainstream economics is assessed. Finally, two possible extensions of Albert's argument, the concepts of oscillating informational content and axiomatic variation, are illustrated with respect to their potential for immunization against critique. Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kapeller, J. (2013). “Model-Platonism” in economics: On a classical epistemological critique. Journal of Institutional Economics, 9(2), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137413000052

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free