Administrative Reform and the Quest for Openness: A Popperian Review of Open Government

17Citations
Citations of this article
254Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Scholars and policymakers claim open government offers a panoply of good governance benefits, but it also risks political abuse as window dressing or a smokescreen. To address this risk, this article builds on the meaning of openness through an examination of closed and open society in Karl Popper’s theory. Four historic trends in open government reform are analyzed. The findings suggest a need for new attention to Popperian notions of the social technologist’s piecemeal change and mechanical engineering aimed at serious policy problems. Without appreciation of these open society linkages, open governments will continue to paradoxically co-exist alongside closed societies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ingrams, A. (2020). Administrative Reform and the Quest for Openness: A Popperian Review of Open Government. Administration and Society, 52(2), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719875460

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free