Reading Sign as a response to an architectural work (Case study: Wisma Garuda)

  • Pane I
  • Hilma T Fachrudin
  • Hesti Fibriasari
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Between objects and observers in the world of architecture have a close relationship. In assessing and appreciating an architectural work it is necessary to synchronize architectural objects as a sign. The sign in question means an architectural work that functions as a sentence that can be read and has a meaning or meaning. The position of an architectural work depends on the observer in appreciating it. In general, this paper explains that an architectural object has an understanding that can be understood by the observer in accordance with the appreciation reached to the observer. The object under study was Wisma Garuda, a budget hotel. Where the hotel applies the concept of experience in architecture, but it reads as Buddhist philosophy by the curator of the Indonesian Pavilion 2018. Even though the architect of the building does not use Buddhist philosophy, based on an analysis of the interconnectedness of Husserl's and Buddha's philosophy it proves that the meaning received by the curator is something natural.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pane, I. F., Hilma T Fachrudin, Hesti Fibriasari, & Aurora S Lubis. (2020). Reading Sign as a response to an architectural work (Case study: Wisma Garuda). Britain International of Linguistics Arts and Education (BIoLAE) Journal, 2(1), 338–345. https://doi.org/10.33258/biolae.v2i1.204

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free