Epistemological Implications of Fieldwork and Their Consequences

  • Salamone F
13Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Fieldwork is anthropology's primary data‐gathering device, providing a boundary marker from related disciplines. Since data obtained through fieldwork form the bases of anthropological theory, it is crucial that their truth value be analyzed. The paper discusses reasons for both the relative lack of epistemological concern in anthropology until recent times and its current vogue. The empirical foundations of fieldwork are examined and a grid is presented for judging the philosophical position of fieldworkers. Application of the methods suggested is illustrated by a case study of missionary/anthropologist field interaction. Finally, an argument is outlined against both rationalism and phenomenology as being antiscientific. These last two positions are seen as the logical result of anthropology's neglect of epistemology. [epistemology, fieldwork, methodology, recurrent relationships, empiricism]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salamone, F. A. (1979). Epistemological Implications of Fieldwork and Their Consequences. American Anthropologist, 81(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1979.81.1.02a00040

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free