AI-powered fraud and the erosion of online survey integrity: an analysis of 31 fraud detection strategies

20Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The proliferation of AI-powered bots and sophisticated fraudsters poses a significant threat to the integrity of scientific studies reliant on online surveys across diverse disciplines, including health, social, environmental and political sciences. We found a substantial decline in usable responses from online surveys from 75 to 10% in recent years due to survey fraud. Monetary incentives attract sophisticated fraudsters capable of mimicking genuine open-ended responses and verifying information submitted months prior, showcasing the advanced capabilities of online survey fraud today. This study evaluates the efficacy of 31 fraud indicators and six ensembles using two agriculture surveys in California. To evaluate the performance of each indicator, we use predictive power and recall. Predictive power is a novel variation of precision introduced in this study, and both are simple metrics that allow for non-academic survey practitioners to replicate our methods. The best indicators included a novel email address score, MinFraud Risk Score, consecutive submissions, opting-out of incentives, improbable location.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pinzón, N., Koundinya, V., Galt, R. E., Dowling, W. O. R., Baukloh, M., Taku-Forchu, N. C., … Pathak, T. B. (2024). AI-powered fraud and the erosion of online survey integrity: an analysis of 31 fraud detection strategies. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1432774

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free