Models, parameterization, and software: Epistemic opacity in computational chemistry

8Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Computational chemistry grew in a new era of “desktop modeling,” which coincided with a growing demand for modeling software, especially from the pharmaceutical industry. Parameterization of models in computational chemistry is an arduous enterprise, and we argue that this activity leads, in this specific context, to tensions among scientists regarding the epistemic opacity transparency of parameterized methods and the software implementing them. We relate one flame war from the Computational Chemistry mailing List in order to assess in detail the relationships between modeling methods, parameterization, software and the various forms of their enclosure or disclosure. Our claim is that parameterization issues are an important and often neglected source of epistemic opacity and that this opacity is entangled in methods and software alike. Models and software must be addressed together to understand the epistemological tensions at stake.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wieber, F., & Hocquet, A. (2020). Models, parameterization, and software: Epistemic opacity in computational chemistry. Perspectives on Science, 28(5), 610–629. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00352

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free