Diversity, equity, inclusion, and access: Confronting the myth of meritocracy in nursing academia

Abstract

This article critically examines how the enduring ideal of meritocracy obstructs diversity, equity, inclusion, and access (DEIA) in nursing education and leadership. While often framed as neutral and objective, meritocratic systems frequently reinforce exclusionary practices by privileging dominant norms and overlooking systemic barriers. Through historical analysis, policy critique, and theoretical frameworks, the paper demonstrates how DEIA initiatives are undermined by institutional resistance, hidden curricula, and performative equity efforts. The article calls for a redefinition of merit that centers equity, lived experience, and structural awareness. By embracing justice-oriented leadership and culturally responsive practices, nursing academia can advance both professional excellence and health equity. This equity-centered vision challenges institutions to dismantle outdated paradigms and align nursing education with its ethical and societal missions.