Accuracy of Borg's ratings of perceived exertion in the prediction of heart rates during pregnancy

41Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

When using Borg's 6-20 scale during pregnancy, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) did not significantly correlate with exercise heart rates (HR) (P > 0.05). The HR predicted from RPE significantly (P < 0.05) underestimated the exercise HR in the second trimester during walking (Group 1: mean difference 16 beats min-1, n = 11), aerobics classes (Group 4: mean 15 beats min-1, n = 48) and circuit training (Group 3: mean 18 beats min-1, n = 24); and in the third trimester during cycling (Group 2: mean 16 beats min-1, n = 12) and aerobics classes (Group 5: mean 11 beats min-1, n = 29). Maximal individual HR under-estimations were large for each physical activity during pregnancy, with values up to 54 beats min-1. Consequently, exercise intensity should not be monitored solely with RPE during pregnancy. © 1992.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Neill, M. E., Cooper, K. A., Mills, C. M., Boyce, E. S., & Hunyor, S. N. (1992). Accuracy of Borg’s ratings of perceived exertion in the prediction of heart rates during pregnancy. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 26(2), 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.26.2.121

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free