Safety of benznidazole use in the treatment of chronic Chagas' disease

80Citations
Citations of this article
127Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the safety of benznidazole use in adult patients with chronic Chagas' disease. Methods: The Naranjo algorithm was applied to classify the causality of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Results: In total, 190 patients were treated with benznidazole over a period of 4-180 days (mean 58.90 ± 36.54 days) with a dose of 50-500 mg/day (221.33 ± 57.16 mg/day). Of the 190 patients treated, 93 had ADRs and 59 of these interrupted treatment. There was a higher incidence of ADRs among female and young adult patients. There was a higher incidence of ADRs during the first 30 days of treatment. Interruption of treatment was more frequent in women. Among the patients who interrupted treatment, 39 had mild ADRs, 19 had moderate ADRs and 1 had a severe ADR. There were no interruptions in treatment for 97 patients without ADRs. The survival curves indicated that the time until interruption of treatment in patients with moderate and severe ADRs was lower than in patients with mild or no ADRs. The most frequent disorders were in the skin (26.3%), gastrointestinal system (9.5%) and nervous system (5.3%). Conclusions: The Naranjo algorithm was a useful tool to reduce the underreporting of ADRs. Events were common, but were associated with low morbidity and were reversible upon discontinuation of drug treatment. Moreover, there were no fatal events; therefore, benznidazole treatment was considered safe. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hasslocher-Moreno, A. M., do Brasil, P. E. A. A., de Sousa, A. S., Xavier, S. S., Chambela, M. C., & Sperandio da Silva, G. M. (2012). Safety of benznidazole use in the treatment of chronic Chagas’ disease. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 67(5), 1261–1266. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dks027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free