Comparison of the reinforced laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation for nasal surgery

35Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Airway maintenance and protection during anaesthesia and recovery provided by the reinforced laryngeal mask airway was compared with the sequential use of a tracheal tube followed by the Guedel airway in 66 patients having anaesthesia for nasal surgery. One patient was withdrawn from the laryngeal mask group because the airway was difficult to position. All patients had an oropharyngeal pack inserted and Moffett's solution instilled into the nasal cavities. At the end of surgery the nasal cavities were packed. During operation airway maintenance was good and airway protection was equally effective in both groups. Contamination of the lower airway occurred in only five patients. During recovery from anaesthesia the laryngeal mask and Guedel airway were well tolerated by most patients, but only the mask laryngeal provided an unobstructed airway in all patients. The laryngeal mask protects the larynx from contamination during and after operation until the return of the patient's own protective reflexes. Copyright © 1995, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, P. J., Thompsett, C., & Bailey, P. M. (1995). Comparison of the reinforced laryngeal mask airway and tracheal intubation for nasal surgery. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05936.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free