Depicting Rubin’s Vase or Faces: Clarifying the Practical Value of Integrated Water Resource Management

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper responds to the significant challenges to Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) and clarifies its practical value as a theoretical framework. Through thorough theoretical analysis, this paper examines how IWRM can be applied to distinguish water resource management (WRM) as an observable domain with an open boundary and foster sustainable ecosystem management by emphasizing the functional differentiation of WRM. Compared to the examination made solely from the WRM perspective, an IWRM perspective can better develop the structural complexity of the WRM domain and help expose misunderstandings regarding integration issues. Most importantly, IWRM is not merely an explanatory theoretical framework but also a defensive one. It can facilitate structural coupling between WRM and other domains to reduce conflicts and enable concerted action. However, this role of IWRM has been overlooked for a long time.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xu, T. (2023). Depicting Rubin’s Vase or Faces: Clarifying the Practical Value of Integrated Water Resource Management. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310281

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free