Comparability of self rated health: Cross sectional multi-country survey using anchoring vignettes

274Citations
Citations of this article
226Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To examine differences in expectations for health using "anchoring vignettes," which describe fixed levels of health on dimensions such as mobility. Design: Cross sectional survey of adults living in the community. Setting: China, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Turkey, and United Arab Emirates. Participants: 3012 men and women aged 18 years and older (self ratings); subsample of 406 (vignette ratings). Main outcome measures: Self rated mobility levels and ratings of hypothetical vignettes using the same questions and response categories. Results: Consistent rankings of vignettes are evidence that vignettes are understood in similar ways in different settings, and internal consistency of orderings on two mobility questions indicates good comprehension. Variation in vignette ratings across age groups suggests that expectations for mobility decline with age. Comparison of responses to two different mobility questions supports the assumption that individual ratings of hypothetical vignettes relate to expectations for health in similar ways as self assessments. Conclusions: Anchoring vignettes could provide a powerful tool for understanding and adjusting for the influence of different health expectations on self ratings of health. Incorporating anchoring vignettes in surveys can improve the comparability of self reported measures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salomon, J. A., Tandon, A., & Murray, C. J. L. (2004, January 31). Comparability of self rated health: Cross sectional multi-country survey using anchoring vignettes. British Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.37963.691632.44

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free