Analytical Performance and Quality Indicators of Fully Automated Immunoassays for sFlt-1 and PlGF

9Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The ratio of the antiangiogenic factor, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1), to the proangiogenic factor, placental growth factor (PlGF), is associated with increased risk of preeclampsia. Here, we describe an analytical evaluation of the Elecsys sFlt-1 and PlGF assays at the first North American site in which they were clinically implemented. Methods: The analytical evaluation included short-and long-Term imprecision, method comparison, accuracy, linearity, sample stability, limit of quantification verification, and measurement uncertainty. Quality indicators were also evaluated, including turnaround time and repeat test frequency. Results: Short-Term (13-day) and long-Term (12-month) imprecision for sFlt-1 and PlGF were <4% CV. Method comparison (n = 40) between Roche cobas e602 and e411 exhibited r > 0.99 and bias <10%. sFlt-1/PlGF ratio rule-out cutoffs (≤33 and ≤38) and rule-in cutoffs (>38, >85, and >110) exhibited negative percent agreement and positive percent agreement of 100%, respectively (n = 40). During the first 12 months, 257 orders were placed, repeat test frequency was 17.5%, mean time between repeat orders was 23 days, and 72.0% of results were reported within 2 h from sample receipt when quality control was run continuously. Conclusions: We describe analytical performance parameters and quality indicators of the Elecsys sFlt-1 and PlGF assays, which was the first North American clinical laboratory site to implement these assays in support of the institution's high-risk obstetrical unit.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Higgins, V., Ma, L., Ragosnig, B. L., Melamed, N., Hladunewich, M., James, T., … Fu, L. (2022). Analytical Performance and Quality Indicators of Fully Automated Immunoassays for sFlt-1 and PlGF. Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine, 7(2), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfab135

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free