The practical utility of interactive, user-guided, theorem proving depends on the design of good interaction environments, the study of which should be grounded in methods of research into human-computer interaction (HCI). This paper discusses the relevance of classifications of programming errors developed by the HCI community to the problem of interactive theorem proving. A new taxonomy of errors is proposed for interaction with theorem provers and its adequacy as a usability metric is assessed experimentally.
CITATION STYLE
Aitken, S., & Melham, T. (2000). Analysis of errors in interactive proof attempts. Interacting with Computers, 12(6), 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(99)00023-5
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.