The association value of random shapes revisited

3Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Vanderplas & Garvin (1959) found the mean association value of their random shapes to be only 38 per cent. Also, more Ss said “yes” than actually naming content. It was hypothesized that a more natural experimental procedure would lead to increased association value and increased content responses for the random shapes. Both hypotheses were supported beyond the.001 level. © 1966, Psychonomic Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eisenman, R. (1966). The association value of random shapes revisited. Psychonomic Science, 6(8), 397–398. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330955

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free