Probability as certainty: Dichotomous thinking and the misuse of p values

77Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Significance testing is widely used and often criticized. The Task Force on Statistical Inference of the American Psychological Association (TFSI, APA; Wilkinson & TFSI, 1999) addressed the use of significance testing and made recommendations that were incorporated in the fifth edition of the APA Publication Manual (APA, 2001). They emphasized the interpretation of significance testing and the importance of reporting confidence intervals and effect sizes. We examined whether 286 Psychonomic Bulletin & Review articles submitted before and after the publication of the TFSI recommendations by APA complied with these recommendations. Interpretation errors when using significance testing were still made frequently, and the new prescriptions were not yet followed on a large scale. Changing the practice of reporting statistics seems doomed to be a slow process. Copyright 2006 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hoekstra, R., Finch, S., & Johnson, A. (2006). Probability as certainty: Dichotomous thinking and the misuse of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13(6), 1033–1037. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213921

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free