Natalizumab in acute ischemic stroke (ACTION II): A randomized, placebo-controlled trial

65Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

ObjectiveWe evaluated the effect of 2 doses of natalizumab on functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).MethodsIn this double-blind phase 2b trial, patients with AIS aged 18-80 years with NIH Stroke Scale scores of 5-23 from 53 US and European sites were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single dose of 300 or 600 mg IV natalizumab or placebo, with randomization stratified by treatment window (≤9 or >9 to ≤24 hours from patient's last known normal state). The primary endpoint was a composite measure of excellent outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤1 and Barthel Index score ≥95) at day 90 assessed in all patients receiving a full dose. Sample size was estimated from a Bayesian model; p values were not used for hypothesis testing.ResultsAn excellent outcome was less likely with natalizumab than with placebo (natalizumab 300 or 600 mg odds ratio 0.60; 95% confidence interval 0.39-0.93). There was no effect modification by time to treatment or use of thrombolysis/thrombectomy. For natalizumab 300 mg, 600 mg, or placebo, there were no differences in incidence of adverse events (90.0%, 92.1%, and 92.3%, respectively), serious adverse events (25.6%, 32.6%, and 20.9%, respectively), or deaths (6.7%, 4.5%, and 5.5%, respectively).ConclusionsNatalizumab administered ≤24 hours after AIS did not improve patient outcomes.ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT02730455Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class I evidence that for patients with AIS, an excellent outcome was less likely in patients treated with natalizumab than with placebo.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elkind, M. S. V., Veltkamp, R., Montaner, J., Johnston, S. C., Singhal, A. B., Becker, K., … Elkins, J. (2020). Natalizumab in acute ischemic stroke (ACTION II): A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology, 95(8), E1091–E1104. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010038

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free