Medical borders: Historical, political, and cultural analyses

11Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Scientific medicine carries within it an inherent contradiction. On the one hand, given its general scientific inquiry into health and disease, their conditions, etiologies, and treatments, it makes a claim for universality. To justify this claim, at different times and in different places, scientific medicine has prioritized techniques such as the medical gaze and autopsies to assure its diagnoses; it has applied numerical methods in order to have a better grasp of diseases and their possible treatments; it has used laboratory analyses in order to understand life at its molecular level; and more recently it has introduced Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT) in order to generalize clinical treatments. On the other hand, contrary to its universalistic claims, scientific medicine sets up and reifies boundaries. It creates distinctions between the healthy and the sick and defines categories, such as gender and race, that have deep political and social meanings. Copyright © Cambridge University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davidovitch, N., & Zalashik, R. (2006, September). Medical borders: Historical, political, and cultural analyses. Science in Context. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889706000949

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free