The dietary inflammatory index is associated with diabetes severity

32Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) is a recently developed dietary inflammation assessment tool. The current study examined the association between DII and the presence and severity of diabetes in adults age >20 years. Research Design and Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of 4434 adult participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2013 to 2014). The DII was calculated based on 24-hour dietary recall data. Linear and logistic regression models were used to estimate the relationship and control for possible confounding factors. Results: Among 4434 participants, mean age was 49.4 years, mean BMI (body mass index) was 29.3 kg/ m2, and mean DII (higher is more inflammatory) was 0.65 (range, -3.41 to +9.05). The mean DII scores in participants with and without diabetes were 0.79 and 0.50, respectively (P = .0098). Participants with Hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c) >9% had higher DII scores than those with 6.5% to 9% HgbA1c (1.37 vs 0.54, P = .0002) and those with <6.5% HgbA1c (1.37 vs 0.50, P < .0001). With 1 point increase in the DII score, odds of having diabetes increased by 13% (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.24). Among the individuals with diabetes, we also observed a significant association between severity of diabetes and DII scores; with 1 point increase in DII score, the odds of having HgbA1c higher than 9% increased by 43% (95% CI, 1.21 to 1.68). Conclusions: The DII had a significant association with diabetes and a stronger association when HgbA1c >9%. Further research will help clarify the association between inflammation and diet and the utility of the DII as a tool in risk assessment and management of patients with diabetes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

King, D. E., & Xiang, J. (2019). The dietary inflammatory index is associated with diabetes severity. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 32(6), 801–806. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2019.06.190092

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free