In our efforts to characterize and improve the performance of an existing steelmaking process or in our quest to generate useful knowledge as a basis for the development of new manufacturing routes, measurements and models should be considered as two interdependent requirements. Without measurements, our models are incomplete and unsatisfactory. Without models, we fail to realize, or perhaps even comprehend, the potential significance of our measurements. Sometimes in our enthusiasm, we construct sophisticated elegant models and forget the reality of the actual manufacturing process. In this computer age, we need to remember again the importance of observations and accurate measurements. In addition, as engineers and applied scientists, we have an obligation and a responsibility to facilitate the transfer of new knowledge into the realm of operating practice. During this process of generation, evaluation, and communication of new knowledge, the knowledge exchange step is perhaps the most difficult. In this context, the preeminent aim of collaborative activities between our educational institutions, industrial organizations, government funding agencies, and professional societies is to ensure the availability of high-quality people who not only understand the fundamental aspects and practical implications of their discipline, but also are fully equipped with the essential skills of communication that will enable them to participate throughout their career in this most challenging and satisfying activity, the science and technology of steelmaking. © 2009 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International.
CITATION STYLE
Stubbles, J. R. (2009). The minimill story. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B: Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science, 40(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-008-9216-9
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.