Artificial intelligence in action

  • Coen A
  • Locraft Cuddapah J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This exploratory embedded mixed methods study examined preservice teachers’ beliefs about artificial intelligence (AI) and their perceived competence in using it for instructional planning. Ten education majors participated in structured activities involving AI platform selection, prompt development, and evaluation of AI-generated lesson plans. Quantitative data from the Teacher Artificial Intelligence Competence Self-Efficacy (TAICS) Scale showed moderate-to-high confidence across most competencies, with lower self-efficacy in AI assessment. Qualitative findings revealed preservice teachers viewed AI as helpful for generating ideas and increasing efficiency, but expressed concerns about accuracy, ethics, and limited personalization. The study introduces an emergent framework, the Triad of AI Literacy Demands for Preservice Teachers, and underscores the importance of integrating critical AI instruction in teacher preparation programs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coen, A., & Locraft Cuddapah, J. (2026). Artificial intelligence in action. American Journal of STEM Education, 20, 111–132. https://doi.org/10.32674/keqjjt69

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free