Increasingly, academic libraries are investing heavily in e-journals which duplicate their print back-runs. For libraries facing acute pressures on space, one solution to their problem is to dispose of or relegate print backruns which overlap with their electronic holdings. This case-study focuses on work at Imperial College London Library to provide a tool-kit for staff making such deselection decisions. Imperial has established criteria to determine the sustainability of their e-journals. A purpose-built database has been developed to store data on sustainability and enable staff easily to identify the overlap between print and electronic holdings at each Library site. Librarians at Imperial are now using the database and have already identified 700 metres of print journals with sustainable electronic access for disposal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]; Copyright of Serials is the property of United Kingdom Serials Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
CITATION STYLE
Cooper, R., & Norris, D. (2007). To bin or not to bin? Deselecting print back-runs available electronically at Imperial College London Library. Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community, 20(3), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1629/20208
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.