Randomised controlled trial of an accommodative support lens designed for computer users

5Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Accommodative support (AS) lenses are a low add progressive addition spectacle lens designed to ease symptoms in computer vision syndrome (CVS). The study aims to investigate if (1) AS lenses improve CVS symptoms; (2) binocular/accommodative functions predict a benefit from AS lenses and (3) wearing AS lenses for six months impacts on binocular/accommodative functions. Methods: Pre-presbyopic adults with symptoms of CVS (Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire, CVS-Q©, score ≥ 6) were randomly allocated to wear AS lenses or control single vision (SV) lenses. The CVS-Q© and a battery of optometric tests were applied at baseline and after three and six months. Participants and researchers were masked to participant group. After six months, the SV group were unmasked and changed to AS lenses and one week later asked to choose which they preferred. Results: The change in CVS-Q© scores from baseline to six months did not differ significantly in the two groups. At the end of the one week period, when the control group wore the AS lenses, control group participants were significantly more likely to prefer AS lenses to SV lenses. No optometric functions correlated with the benefit from AS lenses. AS lenses did not have any adverse effects on binocular or accommodative function. Conclusions: In pre-presbyopic adults, there was no greater improvement in CVS-Q© scores in the group wearing AS lenses than in the control group. No adverse effects on optometric function (including accommodation) are associated with wearing AS lenses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Del Mar Seguí-Crespo, M., Ronda-Pérez, E., Yammouni, R., Arroyo Sanz, R., & Evans, B. J. W. (2022). Randomised controlled trial of an accommodative support lens designed for computer users. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 42(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12913

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free