A clinical review of communication training for haematologists and haemato-oncologists: a case of art versus science

11Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The art of communication at times seems at odds with the science of medicine. Poor communication is associated with risks for patient and physician. Communication skills are highly relevant for haematologists and are associated with increased physician and patient satisfaction, positive psychosocial outcomes and possible health outcomes. Medical communication training has recently become widespread but is largely restricted to junior medical professionals. In haematology, the proliferation of high quality communication skills is low and there are few interventions catering for the required skillset. A review identified five applicable interventions for haematologists. There is variation in intervention length and structure, and most studies measure targeted skill fidelity rather than patient outcomes. Work on motivation and empowerment holds potential for haematological conditions, but is largely absent from care. This review highlights the need for new interventions for haematologists which focus on producing and maintaining positive patient outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Christie, D., & Glew, S. (2017, July 1). A clinical review of communication training for haematologists and haemato-oncologists: a case of art versus science. British Journal of Haematology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.14606

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free