The effect of variations in experimental and computational fidelity on data assimilation approaches

5Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We conduct a comprehensive analysis of two data assimilation methods: the first utilizes the discrete adjoint approach with a correction applied to the production term of the turbulence transport equation, preserving the Boussinesq approximation. The second is a state observer method that implements a correction in the momentum equations alongside a turbulence model, both applied to fluid dynamics simulations. We investigate the impact of varying computational mesh resolutions and experimental data resolutions on the performance of these methods within the context of a periodic hill test case. Our findings reveal the distinct strengths and limitations of both methods, which successfully assimilate data to improve the accuracy of a RANS simulation. The performance of the variational model correction method is independent of input data and computational mesh resolutions. The state observer method, on the other hand, is sensitive to the resolution of the input data and CFD mesh.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thompson, C., Cadambi Padmanaban, U., Ganapathisubramani, B., & Symon, S. (2024). The effect of variations in experimental and computational fidelity on data assimilation approaches. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 38(3), 431–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00162-024-00708-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free