Crime and war in Afghanistan Part II: A Jeffersonian Alternative?

42Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In Part I of this article, US President, Barack Obama, is reported as saying to his inner circle that their objective in Afghanistan is not to build a Jeffersonian democracy. Part II is about the idea that a more Jeffersonian architecture of rural republicanism in tune with Afghan traditions is a remedy to limits of the Hobbesian analysis of cases like Afghanistan in Part I. Anomic spaces where policing and justice do not work are vacuums that can attract tyrannical forms of law and order, such as the rule of the Taliban. Peace with justice cannot prevail in the aftermath of such an occupation without a reliance on both local community justice and state justice that are mutually constitutive. Supporting checks on abuse of power through balancing local and national institutions that deliver justice is a more sustainable peace-building project than regime change and top-down re-engineering of successor regimes. © 2012 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wardak, A., & Braithwaite, J. (2013). Crime and war in Afghanistan Part II: A Jeffersonian Alternative? British Journal of Criminology, 53(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs066

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free