Some unanswered questions about goal effects: A recommended change in research methods

32Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Goal setting has been described to managers as a “motivational technique that works” (Locke and Latham, 1984), despite a lack of theoretical explanations in the organisational behaviour literature about why, how or when it works. Recent advances have been made in the development of goal effects theory which attempt to deal with these issues (e.g. Locke et al., 1981; Naylor and Ilgen, 1984). This paper complements those theoretical developments through a discussion of how existing laboratory and field studies have tended to overlook learning, task and chronic effects in the study of goal effects. The pros and cons of using a research game for the study of goal effects are discussed and a research game which has been developed to study goal, feedback and task effects on individual performance is described. © 1985, SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wood, R. E., & Bailey, T. C. (1985). Some unanswered questions about goal effects: A recommended change in research methods. Australian Journal of Management, 10(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289628501000105

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free