Of elephants and men

13Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Baker & Winkler's target article is well-researched and thought-provoking, but I do have four points of contention: (1) The proposal to entrust elephants to traditional mahout culture has restricted elephants' freedom of movement and reproduction and (ab)used them. (2) The concept of "indigenous" simultaneously reifies and denigrates the "noble savages", privileging only human indigenous groups, ignoring nonhuman indigenes. (3) Most lifestyles have been globalized under consumer-economic and anthropocentric worldviews. (4) The fact that people (including mahouts) are part of nature does not mean they are benevolent, any more than cities, monocultures, or roads are.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kopnina, H. (2020). Of elephants and men. Animal Sentience, 5(28). https://doi.org/10.51291/2377-7478.1553

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free