A pilot study of scoliosis assessment using radiation free surface topography in children with GMFCS IV and V cerebral palsy

2Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background Prevalence of scoliosis in cerebral palsy (CP) parallels the extent of neurological impairment and causes significant morbidity. Monitoring is important but requires regular radiological investigation. Surface topography provides a non-radiological approach to scoliosis monitoring. Aim To evaluate validity, reproducibility and feasibility of Quantec® scans to monitor scoliosis in children with severe CP. Methods Twenty non-ambulant children with CP, Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) grade IV/V had clinical, radiological and Quantec spinal assessment. The children were supported during scans using a seating system specifically designed for this study. Validity was assessed by comparing Quantec (Q) angle with gold standard (Cobb angle), reproducibility analysed using Bland-Altman plots and feasibility assessed using a questionnaire. Results Prevalence of scoliosis on radiological examination was 65%. Of these children, 85% had curves with Cobb angle less than 28°. Quantec scanning was feasible with appropriate postural support. Mean (and standard deviation) for differences between Cobb and Quantec (Q) angle were 0.02° (6.2°) and for Quantec inter-observer variability were 0.5° (5.8°). Conclusions Quantec scanning was feasible, reproducible and had good validity when compared with Cobb angle in a supportive seating system. To consolidate these findings a further study needs to be undertaken with larger number of children with Cobb angles between 25° and 45°. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sadani, S., Jones, C., Seal, A., Bhakta, B., Hall, R., & Levesley, M. (2012). A pilot study of scoliosis assessment using radiation free surface topography in children with GMFCS IV and V cerebral palsy. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38(6), 854–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01292.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free