The Costs and Benefits of Regulating the Market for Corporate Insolvency Practitioner Remuneration

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The release by the Australian Treasury on Friday, 7 November 2014 of the Insolvency Law Reform Bill (ILRB) 2014 throws the spotlight once again on corporate insolvency law reform in Australia. Significantly, the ILRB 2014 identifies amongst its purposes two objectives with respect to Corporate Insolvency Practitioner (CIP) remuneration reform. Namely, to promote market competition on price and quality and improve the overall confidence in the professionalism and competence of insolvency practitioners. This paper considers whether the proposed CIP remuneration reforms outlined in the ILRB 2014 will effectively achieve these objectives. Where it is considered that reforms are misdirected, further changes, informed by UK insolvency reform proposals, are considered.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dickfos, J. (2016). The Costs and Benefits of Regulating the Market for Corporate Insolvency Practitioner Remuneration. International Insolvency Review, 25(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1239

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free