Two formalizations of context: A comparison

1Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between two well known formalizations of context: Propositional Logic of Context (PLC) [4], and Local Models Semantics (LMS) [11]. We start with a summary of the desiderata for a logic of context, mainly inspired by McCarthy’s paper on generality in AI [15] and his notes on formalizing context [16]. We briefly present LMS, and its axiomatization using MultiContext Systems (MCS) [14]. Then we present a revised (and simplified) version of PLC, and we show that local vocabularies – as they defined in [4] – are inessential in the semantics of PLC. The central part of the paper is the definition of a class of LMS (and its axiomatization in MCS, called MMCC), which is provably equivalent to the axiomatization of PLC as described in [4]. Finally, we go back to the general desiderata and discuss in detail how the two formalisms fulfill (or do not fulfill) each of them.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bouquet, P., & Serafini, L. (2004). Two formalizations of context: A comparison. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 2116, pp. 87–101). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44607-9_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free