Consciousness-based approaches to non-human moral status maintain that consciousness is necessary for (some degree or level of) moral status. While these approaches are intuitive to many, in this paper I argue that the judgment that consciousness is necessary for moral status is not secure enough to guide policy regarding non-humans, that policies responsive to the moral status of non-humans should take seriously the possibility that psychological features independent of consciousness are sufficient for moral status. Further, I illustrate some practical consequences of calling consciousness-based views into question.
CITATION STYLE
Shepherd, J. (2023). Non-Human Moral Status: Problems with Phenomenal Consciousness. AJOB Neuroscience, 14(2), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2022.2148770
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.