Screening of psychiatric disorders in women with high-risk pregnancy: Accuracy of three psychological tools

15Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the optimal cutoff points of three psychological tools for screening psychiatric disorders in women with high-risk pregnancy. Design and Methods: In this cross-sectional study (N = 155), sensitivity/specificity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Brief Symptom Inventory 53-items (BSI-53), and the BSI-18 were computed with respect to having a psychiatric diagnosis based on the clinical interview. Results: The usual cutoffs (≥13 for EPDS, T-score of 63 for BSI-53) demonstrated poor diagnostic accuracy. The optimal thresholds were computed for EPDS cutoff of 6.5, GSI = 0.47 for BSI-53, and GSI = 0.5 for BSI-18. Practice Implications: The use of psychological tools among pregnant women with high-risk pregnancy may need to be modified in order to accurately identify psychiatric disorders.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hamidia, A., Kheirkhah, F., Chehrazi, M., Basirat, Z., Ghadimi, R., Barat, S., … Faramarzi, M. (2022). Screening of psychiatric disorders in women with high-risk pregnancy: Accuracy of three psychological tools. Health Science Reports, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.518

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free