Heideggerian Phenomenology, Practical Ontologies and the Link Between Experience and Practices

6Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Postphenomenologists and performativists criticize classical approaches to phenomenology for isolating human subjects from their socio-material relations. The purpose of this essay is to repudiate their criticism by presenting a nuanced account of phenomenology thus making it evident that phenomenological theories have the potential for meshing with the performative idiom of contemporary science and technology studies (STS). However, phenomenology retains an apparent shortcoming in that its proponents typically focus on human–nonhuman relations that arise in localized contexts. For this reason, it seems to contrast with one of the core assumptions behind practical ontologies: that socio-practical significance extends beyond an agent’s immediate situatedness in a localized context. Turning to Heidegger’s phenomenology and his notion of ‘de-distancing’, the essay explores how localized phenomena that pertain to human experience connect with global practices (i.e., socio-material assemblages and networks) and, thus, the possibility of consilience between phenomenological research and present-day STS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gahrn-Andersen, R. (2019). Heideggerian Phenomenology, Practical Ontologies and the Link Between Experience and Practices. Human Studies, 42(4), 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-019-09493-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free