Is forgetting reprehensible?: Holocaust remembrance and the task of oblivion

23Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

"Forgetting" plays an important role in the lives of individuals and communities. Although a few Holocaust scholars have begun to take forgetting more seriously in relation to the task of remembering - in popular parlance as well as in academic discourse on the Holocaust -forgetting is usually perceived as a negative force. In the decades following 1945, the terms remembering and forgetting have often been used antithetically, with the communities of victims insisting on the duty to remember and a society of perpetrators desiring to forget. Thus, the discourse on Holocaust memory has become entrenched on this issue. This essay counters the swift rejection of forgetting and its labeling as a reprehensible act. It calls attention to two issues: first, it offers a critical argument for different forms of forgetting; second, it concludes with suggestions of how deliberate performative practices of forgetting might benefit communities affected by a genocidal past. Is it possible to conceive of forgetting not as the ugly twin of remembering but as its necessary companion? © 2008 Journal of Religious Ethics, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krondorfer, B. (2008). Is forgetting reprehensible?: Holocaust remembrance and the task of oblivion. Journal of Religious Ethics, 36(2), 233–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2008.00345.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free