First-birth Timing, Marital History, and Women’s Health at Midlife

36Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite evidence that first-birth timing influences women’s health, the role of marital status in shaping this association has received scant attention. Using multivariate propensity score matching, we analyze data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 to estimate the effect of having a first birth in adolescence (prior to age 20), young adulthood (ages 20–24), or later ages (ages 25–35) on women’s midlife self-assessed health. Findings suggest that adolescent childbearing is associated with worse midlife health compared to later births for black women but not for white women. Yet, we find no evidence of health advantages of delaying first births from adolescence to young adulthood for either group. Births in young adulthood are linked to worse health than later births among both black and white women. Our results also indicate that marriage following a nonmarital adolescent or young adult first birth is associated with modestly worse self-assessed health compared to remaining unmarried.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, K., Sassler, S., Addo, F., & Frech, A. (2015). First-birth Timing, Marital History, and Women’s Health at Midlife. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 56(4), 514–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146515609903

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free